As the potential of mobile technology begins to be realized,
a frequently ignored factor of infrastructure are the broadcast antennas. The
proliferation of these antennas in the urban environment has, in some
municipalities, challenged our understanding and acceptance of visible infrastructure
and aesthetics of the urban fabric. Standard cell antennas are tall, narrow,
grey blocks (http://www.mbs.ie/images/antenna3.jpg).
Owing to the corporate structure of the wireless industry means a duplication
of the physical infrastructure as each competing company builds overlapping
networks. This has lead to buildings bristling with antennas. (Seen next link).
Such obvious infrastructure, in some municipalities, can, unaltered, fade into
the background, while in others deliberate steps are taken camouflage the
antennas. While looking for photos to illustrate this point, I found a popular
article on this subject (http://www.theatlanticcities.com/design/2012/07/dont-hide-cell-phone-towers-embrace-them/2437/).
An interesting question is why this is necessary? Star’s model of
infrastructure may provide important insights into understanding how things
become infrastructure. And therefore, help explain why certain communities need
and extra push to see this ICT infrastructure as also part of their urban infrastructure.
I think I will become a great follower.Just want to say your story is striking. The clarity in your post is simply striking and i can take for granted you are an expert on this subject.
ReplyDelete